Мужчина ворвался в прямой эфир телеканала и спустил штаны20:53
Testing and proof are complementary. Testing, including property-based testing and fuzzing, is powerful: it catches bugs quickly, cheaply, and often in surprising ways. But testing provides confidence. Proof provides a guarantee. The difference matters, and it is hard to quantify how high the confidence from testing actually is. Software can be accompanied by proofs of its correctness, proofs that a machine checks mechanically, with no room for error. When AI makes proof cheap, it becomes the stronger path: one proof covers every possible input, every edge case, every interleaving. A verified cryptographic library is not better engineering. It is a mathematical guarantee.
，详情可参考WPS官方版本下载
第一百二十一条 被处罚人、被侵害人对公安机关依照本法规定作出的治安管理处罚决定，作出的收缴、追缴决定，或者采取的有关限制性、禁止性措施等不服的，可以依法申请行政复议或者提起行政诉讼。
At some point, enough has to be enough. Apparently, the upcoming versions are going to be bug fix/improvement focused releases in the vein of the legendary Snow Leopard release (which itself was not uncontroversial at the time of its release for the number of things it removed). But with things having gotten this bad over so many years, my question is: does Apple even have the organizational acuity to understand, value and focus on these problems?
Source: Computational Materials Science, Volume 266